CARBON DIOXIDE HAS INCREASED FIFTY PERCENT
WILD FIRES
From The Guardian
Carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels have increased by half in the last 20 years, giving the world much less chance of avoiding dangerous climate change, according to new data.
The research was published as lead negotiators were arriving at the UN climate talks in Durban, South Africa, where prospects of a new global treaty on climate change appeared to have stalled, with deep divisions between developed and developing countries.
Last year, emissions from burning fossil fuels rose by 5.9%, bringing the total rise since 1990, the baseline year for calculating emissions under the Kyoto protocol, to 49%, an average rate of increase of about 3.1% a year.
Prof Corinne Le Quéré, director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research at the University of East Anglia, and an author of the research, said the data showed that little had been achieved in the past two decades in reducing the risks from climate change.
“There have been efforts to use more renewable energy and improve energy efficiency but what this shows is that so far, the effects have been marginal,” she said. “We need to do something about the 80% of energy that still comes from burning fossil fuels.”
She said the problem was urgent, as the chances of holding global temperature rises to less than 2C above pre-industrial levels (which scientists regard as the limit of safety) beyond which climate change becomes catastrophic and irreversible, were dependent on emissions peaking by 2020 at the latest.
Governments meeting in Durban this week are focusing on a new treaty that, if it can be achieved, would not come into force until 2020. “That would be too late, unless strong actions are taken in the meantime,” said Le Quéré.
Some governments and policy advisers have been advocating a different approach to the climate negotiations, suggesting that a system of voluntary reductions in emissions undertaken by national governments and industries could be more effective than a “top-down” global treaty. But this so-called “bottom up” approach did not appear to be working currently, Le Quéré said, as efforts to cut emissions so far had made little impact outside Europe, where emissions have been successfully reduced.
The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Nature Climate Change, found that global carbon emissions were likely to carry on increasing at a rate of about 3% per year. It was accompanied by another study offering new proof that climate change is linked to human activities, in burning fossil fuel.
Prof Chris Rapley, professor of Climate Science at University College London, said: “These two new results offer a stark message. Human carbon emissions are certainly disturbing the climate system upon which we depend, and in spite of the economic slowdown, and despite all the efforts by governments, businesses and people to reduce them, our emissions are reaching new highs. The climatic consequences, already emerging, will grow over time, and are irreversible.
“A new level of decisive action is required now to achieve real emissions reductions. World leaders at the climate negotiations at Durban know the score; the opportunity to act consistent with their responsibilities and rank lies before them. We can only hope that they rise to the challenge.”
Julia Steinberger, lecturer in ecological economics at the Sustainability Research Institute, University of Leeds, said the research showed that even the recession had barely made a dent on the rise in greenhouse gas emissions.
She said: “The worst economic crisis in decades was apparently a mere hiccup in terms of carbon emissions: a temporary drop for the richest countries in 2009, and hardly perceived by emerging economies. These findings are truly shocking, and constitute a global wake-up call.
“The economic crisis should have been an opportunity to invest in low-carbon infrastructure for the 21st century. Instead, we fostered a lose-lose situation: carbon emissions rocketing to unprecedented levels, alongside increases in joblessness, energy costs and income disparities. Surely the transition to a green economy has never seemed more appealing.”
Dr. Pinna says:
The inevitable end of mankind will happen in approximately thirty years. Most readers will be old or dead by that time. Their children or grandchildren will have to face that reality.
However, the lead up time to the demise of human society will not be pretty.
We will see incredibly high winds whenever there is a low pressure area. Just last week, in California, a wind storm hit and the winds were historic in their ferocity. The high winds are due to the high levels of energy in the atmosphere.
In addition, temperatures will rise everywhere. Clouds will therefore be seen less often due to the fact that the water vapour must rise higher in the atmosphere in order to condense. Anyone who looks at clouds will see them disappear early in the day.
Drought and wild fires will be everywhere.
Because of drought, food production will drop and food prices will rise.
These events are now occurring and will accelerate.
Unfortunately, none of this can be prevented. The human race is fundamentally too stupid to prevent its own demise.
Fortunate people with large quantities of money will start to relocate to areas near the poles, where the climate has less effect. Scandinavia and New Zealand and Southern Argentina will be the new areas of human development. These areas are already limiting foreign immigration.
As the temperature starts getting hotter and hotter and more wild fires burn and food prices rise, the human population will get frightened. This will not deter governments and sellers of machinery from stopping their propaganda that: “It will be better “Next Year.”
The average person will keep driving his gas guzzling car even though it means certain death.
When the water supplies run out, then people will act.
At that point it will do little good.
A few thousand years from then Nature should come back… sans the “Most Intelligent Species.”
